Strengthening the Sixth
  • Sixth Amendment Rights
    Access to Witnesses and Evidence Confrontation & Cross-Examination Impartial and Representative Juries Public Trial Right to Counsel Speedy Trial Jury Trial
  • About This Project
    About The JFA Grant How to Apply TTA Sites Who We Are
  • Resources
    COVID-19 & 6th Amendment Disability Rights Interactive Discovery Tool
  • Apply Now

Confrontation & Cross-Examination Resources

Resources on the Sixth Amendment right to confrontation and cross-examination. 



Cases  Law Review Articles  News Articles  Other Legal Sources  Videos


CASES

Confrontation

  • Williams v. Illinois, 567 U.S. 50 (2012)

  • Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011)

  • Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009)

  • Giles v. California, 554 U.S. 353 (2008)

  • Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006)

  • Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)


Cross-Examination

  • Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308 (1974)

  • Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284, 295 (1973) 


LAW REVIEW ARTICLES

  • William Ortman, Confrontation in the Age of Plea Bargaining, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 121, 2021.

  • Hamm, Andrew, Shifting Confrontation from Final Product to Forensic Process: Two Maryland Cases Demonstrate the Pitfalls of Justice Thomas’s Approach to What is Testimonial and the Need for a Re-Framed Formality Test (September 13, 2020). Forthcoming in the Criminal Law Bulletin, Vol. 57.

  • Mark Spottswood, Truth, Lies, and the Confrontation Clause, 89 U. Colo. L. Rev 566 (2018).

  • Stephanos Bibas, The Limits of Textualism in Interpreting the Confrontation Clause, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, no. 37 (2014).

  • Sanders, Shaakirrah, Unbranding Confrontation as Only a Trial Right (October 4, 2013). 65 Hastings L. J. 1257 (2014).

  • Christine Holst, The Confrontation Clause and Pretrial Hearings: A Due Process Solution, 2010 U. Ill. L. Rev. 1599 (2010).

  • Tokson, Matthew J., Virtual Confrontation: Is Videoconference Testimony by an Unavailable Witness Constitutional? (June 11, 2007). University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 74, No. 4, 2007.

  • Friedman, Richard D. "Remote Testimony." U. Mich. J. L. Reform 35, no. 4 (2002): 695-717 


OTHER LEGAL SOURCES

  • How Video Changes the Conversation: Social Science Research on Communication Over Video and Implications for the Criminal Courtroom (NLADA, CCI 2021).

  • Right to Confront Adverse Witnesses: Current Doctrine 


NEWS ARTICLES

  • Defending The Right To Confrontation In Virtual Criminal Trials, By Michelle Bradford and David Frazee, Law360.com, October 1, 2020.

  • Covid-19's Next Victim? The Rights of the Accused. (NACDL, 2020).

  • How Litigators Are Confronting COVID in the Courtroom, By Norma Izzo, American Bar Association, August 31, 2020. 


VIDEOS AND WEBINARS

The Confrontation Clause: Crawford v. Washington

The Confrontation Clause: Crawford v. Washington

The Sixth Amendment’s confrontation clause gives the accused the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him” at a criminal trial. This film uses the Supreme Court case Crawford v. Washington to help explain the history and importance of the confrontation clause and why the framers knew it would be crucial to an effective system of justice.”


Confrontation of Witnesses - The Basics

Confrontation of Witnesses - The Basics

Criminal Procedure video dealing with Crawford v. Washington and its reading of the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause. The lecture covers the basic holding and reasoning, and briefly previews its application in two high-volume contexts.


The Right to Face Your Accuser: Child Abuse and the Sixth Amendment

The Right to Face Your Accuser: Child Abuse and the Sixth Amendment

Should the Confrontation Clause limit the admissibility of children's statements to mandatory child abuse reporters? Richard Friedman (University of Michigan Law School) and Thomas Lyon (USC Gould School of Law) will discuss alternative perspectives on the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The Confrontation Clause typically guarantees citizens the right to face their accusers. The unique circumstances of child abuse raised in Ohio v. Clark perhaps require deeper consideration.

Stay Informed

Sign up to receive updates.

Thank you for signing up

We will be in touch soon.

Copyright © National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

This Web site is funded in whole or in part through a grant from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Neither the U.S. Department of Justice nor any of its components operate, control, are responsible for, or necessarily endorse, this Web site (including, without limitation, its content, technical infrastructure, and policies, and any services or tools provided).